Thursday, July 16, 2015

Vincent Varisano Legendary Investor Jim Rogers: Ruble a Better Currency Than Dollar

Vincent Varisano,

This article originally appeared at Sputnik 


American investor Jim Rogers has actively encouraged investing into Russia. During his interview with Gazeta.ru Rogers said that he has joined the Board of Directors and bought shares of ‘PhosAgro’ which is a Russian chemical holding company producing fertilizer, phosphates and feed phosphates.

He also increased the proportion of shares of the Moscow Stock Exchange and he also has a paper of ‘Aeroflot’.

Concerning the current rouble situation Rogers said, “Russia has low debt, unlike Greece, as well as convertible currency, which is quite unique for the new markets. So fundamentally its position can be called normal. It is being pressured by lower oil prices, but as soon as the black gold finds the stable point the situation will improve for the rouble.”

He also mentioned the dollar saying that the US currency is in a terrible situation as the US national debt and trade deficit are huge.

“If we simply write out on paper the facts that lie behind the ruble and the dollar, without naming the currency, then everyone will want to buy rubles and no one will buy dollars. But as soon as you name them then, of course, people buy dollars.”

He added that he hopes he will be smart enough to get rid of dollars before the collapse happens. “Everything seems perfect, until one day it ceases to be so. It was the same with Britain, France, Spain and Greece. Often stocks manage to go up for a few years before hitting bankruptcy.”

It is a matter of time before Asia becomes a major partner for Russia. For America this would mean that they will not receive their share of potential in the Asian market. The “US has simply shot itself in the foot.”

“The Asian market is much larger — 3 billion people. The population of the United States and Europe is a little more than 1 billion people. For Russia it is better to be with 3 billion creditors than 1 billion debtors,” the investor explained.

Jim Rogers said that China, Korea, Japan, Taiwan, Hong Kong and Singapore are where all the money is, while the US and Europe have become the largest debtors.



via Vincent Varisano, Legendary Investor Jim Rogers: Ruble a Better Currency Than Dollar

Vincent Varisano US Currency Losing Status as Countries Opt-out of Dollar Trade

Vincent Varisano,

This article originally appeared at Visual Capitalist. Infographic from Sputnik


The dollar has been a stalwart of international trade over the majority of the last century. Around the time of the formation of the Eurozone, it reached its recent peak at 71.0% of official foreign exchange reserves. Since then, its composition of global reserves has more recently dropped to a more modest 62.9% in 2014.

However, the dollar is slowly losing its status as the world’s undisputed reserve currency. This is not an unusual event as far as history goes.

In fact, about every century or so since the Renaissance, the global reserve currency has shifted. Portugal, Spain, The Netherlands, France, and Britain have had dominant currencies at different times.

Today’s infographic (below) shows that the wind is shifting in international trade.With less countries and organizations using the dollar to settle international transactions, it slowly chips away at its hegemony of the dollar. China is at the epicenter and the country is making continued progress in cutting deals outside of the U.S. dollar framework.

Deals shown in the graphic are currency flows between countries that have abandoned the dollar in bilateral trade, as well as countries that are considering such measures.

Link to picture

The most recent culmination of these trends is the creation of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), a China-led rival to the World Bank and IMF that includes 57 founding countries and $100 billion of capital. The United States is not a member and has actively lobbied its allies to avoid joining due to perceived governance issues.

Other recent deals by China include: a 30-year $400 billion energy alliance with Russia, a second energy deal focusing on natural gas worth $284 billion with Russia, and a deal removing tariffs on 85% of Australian commodity exports to China. Further, China and Russia have agreed to pay each other in domestic currencies in order to bypass the U.S. dollar.

It is not only the Chinese that are starting to question the viability of the dollar. A report in 2010 by the United Nations called for the abandonment of the U.S. dollar as the single reserve currency. The Gulf Cooperation Council has also expressed desires for an independent reserve currency.

In the short term, especially with a crashing Chinese stock market and fledgling Eurozone, the dollar will likely reign supreme. It’s still a stretch for the yuan to make its way into foreign reserve coffers so long as capital controls remain in place and the country’s bond market is not open or transparent to offshore investors. However, Beijing is currently mulling ways to internationalize the yuan, and each step it takes will take China closer to challenging dollar hegemony.

With more bilateral trade transactions bypassing the dollar, and the increasing internationalization of the Chinese financial system, the yuan is eventually going to give the dollar a run for its money.



via Vincent Varisano, US Currency Losing Status as Countries Opt-out of Dollar Trade

Wednesday, July 15, 2015

Vincent Varisano Fabio Capello, Manager of Russia National Football Team Leaves With $16 Million Pay-Off

Vincent Varisano,

This article originally appeared at Inside World Football


July 14 – Russian preparations for the 2018 World Cup may be progressing smoothly when it comes to building stadia and planning transport infrastructure, but dissatisfaction with the national team’s progress under coach Fabio Capello has resulted in his contract being terminated three years before the finals. 

Capello’s future had been in discussion with the Russian Football Union since June of last year, which was the start of a six month period in which he went unpaid. Most of his backroom staff, who also had wages outstanding, had departed Russia months before the final decision to terminate Capello’s contract.

Nikita Simonyan, the RFU’s acting president, said that all outstanding money owed to Capello until the end of the 2014-15 season had been paid. R-Sport has put the level of the compensation at 930 million rubles ($16.34 million).

The RFU had been struggling for finance in the face of a lack of high paying sponsors. Capello’s contract was out of sync with the RFU’s economic situation, especially as his salary was negotiated and paid in euros at a time when the rouble was dropping in value, effectively almost doubling his cost to the federation.

But it was the Russian team performances that ultimately sealed his fate.

Capello took over the Russian team in 2012 and lead them to the Brazil 2014 World Cup following an impressive unbeaten qualifying campaign. But the Brazil tournament was a disappointment, with Russia being eliminated in the group stages.

With qualification for Euro2016 now looking more difficult following a surprise loss to Austria and just eight points won from six games, Russia will likely have to face a qualifying play off to reach the finals. The calls for Capello’s sacking were even being heard in the Russian Duma.

Russia is expecting a strong home team performance in 2018, but now looks to be running out of time to prepare a world beating squad, Euro2016 would be a crucial measure of the team’s progress.

The Executive Committee of the RFU has just passed a ‘6+5’ limit on the foreign players allowed to play in Russian football clubs – a rule believed vital to give Russian players experience at the top level. Previously the rule was for 10 foreign players and 15 Russians in a Superleague squad and ‘7+4’ players on the pitch (no more than seven foreign players on the pitch at any one time).

But the new rule may be too late to have any real effect on the national team by the World Cup in 2018.

No successor to Capello has been named but the RFU is expected to choose a Russian national as its next manager with CSKA Moscow coach Leonid Slutski being the current favourite for the job.



via Vincent Varisano, Fabio Capello, Manager of Russia National Football Team Leaves With $16 Million Pay-Off

Vincent Varisano Moscow Beats Paris as Europe's Largest Shopping Center Market

Vincent Varisano,

 

This article originally appeared at Russia Beyond the Headlines

 


Moscow has overtaken Paris to become the European capital with the most shopping center space, even as a recession forces Russians to cut back on consumer spending.

In the first half of this year Moscow had more than 4.53 million square meters of shopping center retail space, compared with 4.5 million square meters in Paris, according to a report by real estate consultancy Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL).

But the boom in Moscow mall building will be followed by a slump as Russia’s economic downturn catches up with the sector, experts told The Moscow Times. The new economic reality will also likely end a trend of building massive mega-malls in Moscow and spur the growth of smaller shopping centers that are cheaper to build and run, they said.

Large malls have hogged investors’ attention for long enough, according to Olesya Dzyuba, head of research at real estate firm Colliers International Russia.

“Small format shopping malls have great potential on the Moscow market since there are not enough of them,” she said.

Record volumes

Six shopping centers have already opened in Moscow this year with a total area of 343,000 square meters, according to data from Colliers International. 
“It’s an absolute record,” Dzyuba said.

But the new space is coming online just as an economic crisis is hitting Russians’ spending power. Russia’s economy is expected to shrink by around 3 percent this year under pressure from sanctions imposed by the United States and European Union over the Ukraine crisis and the fallen price of oil, Russia’s main export. With incomes falling sharply, Russians spent 7.7 percent less on consumer purchases in the first five months of this year than in the same period in 2014, according to official data from the Rosstat statistics service.

The mega-malls now opening in Moscow were begun long before the current crisis, when retailers were confident of economic growth and were developing rapidly.

But the recession is causing a shift in attitudes that will temper enthusiasm for new mall projects, said Nikolai Kazansky, managing partner of Colliers International Russia.

“Since consumer demand isn’t growing, retailers are no longer enthusiastic about developing their chains in Russia,” he said.

Vacancy rates in new shopping malls are now around 6-8 percent, compared with 3 percent before the crisis, according to estimates by JLL. Many malls have slashed rent rates, some by up to 50 percent, to keep retailers.

According to Denis Sokolov, head of research at real estate firm Cushman & Wakefield Russia, only one or two new shopping malls will open next year.

Colliers International is more optimistic, predicting that 500,000 square meters of new retail space will come online in 2016 — the same as this year — but that 2017 will see a sharp slowdown.

According to JLL data, investment in Moscow retail real estate amounted to $2.2 billion in 2013, of which about 60 percent was foreign capital. Last year, only $350 million was invested, all from Russian sources.

Changing format

The economic crisis will reduce not only the number of new shopping centers in Moscow in the near future, but also their size.

Despite being a popular European trend, small format shopping centers are not common in Russia.

With fast economic growth producing huge rises in annual consumer spending, the last decade saw developers build massive shopping centers with an area of 100,000 square meters or more to quickly supply retail space to the market.

Capping that trend, Moscow’s mega-mall Avia Park, which opened last year at 228,500 square meters, became Europe’s biggest shopping center.

But with Russia’s economy predicted to emerge slowly from the current crisis, the logic will change.

Smaller shopping centers that are closer to residential areas will be easier to fill than huge malls, said Tatyana Kluchinskaya, head of the retail department at real estate consultancy Jones Lang LaSalle Russia.

Cushman & Wakefield’s Sokolov added that developers will find it harder to raise financing during the crisis for large shopping centers, which on average require about $500 million.

While Moscow now has Europe’s biggest stock of shopping center retail space, the market still has great growth potential. At more than 12 million people, Moscow has an official population five times larger than that of Paris, which has around 2.25 million residents within its city limits.

“In Moscow we have 434 square meters of shopping centre space per 1,000 residents. In big European cities the volume of shopping center retail space per 1,000 residents is 600-700 meters,” Dzyuba said.



via Vincent Varisano, Moscow Beats Paris as Europe's Largest Shopping Center Market

Tuesday, July 14, 2015

Vincent Varisano Crimea to Get a Badly Needed Second Airport

Vincent Varisano,

This article originally appeared at The Moscow Times


Crimea will get a second commercial airport in 2016 as Russia seeks to improve transport links with the peninsula, which Moscow annexed from Ukraine last year, news agency TASS reported Monday, citing local government officials.

The Russian government has promoted travel to Crimea, whose economy relies on tourism. But Russians can only reach the peninsula by air or over-scheduled ferry from mainland Russia.

The Sevastopol government has estimated that the Belbek airport will be able to take half a million passengers annually from numerous Russian cities following renovations, which it expects to cost 1.5 billion rubles ($27 million), according to TASS.

Read more in The Moscow Times



via Vincent Varisano, Crimea to Get a Badly Needed Second Airport

Saturday, July 11, 2015

Vincent Varisano Why the Oil Glut will Continue and How it Benefits Russia

Vincent Varisano,

According to the International Energy Agency (“IEA”) the oil supply glut is set to continue until well into 2016.

Inevitably there will be some people who will say that the IEA is deliberately talking down the market so as to encourage a low oil price, which is presumed to be beneficial for Western economies.

What the IEA is predicting however follows the classic pattern of an over-supply glut.

The initial response of producers to a supply glut is to increase rather than cut back production as a way of keeping market share and maintaining cash flow through higher sales.  Heavily indebted marginal producers like the shale producers in the US tend to do this to an even greater degree than more established producers, since they have to maintain cash flow to pay their debts.

The result is that as production grows the supply glut increases driving prices down even more.

This is the process the IEA is describing and given the state of the market and the debt financing needs of US shale producers - the weakest link in the industry - it makes complete sense.

Oil is by no means unique in following this pattern.  One of the reasons for the “dust bowls” in the US in the 1930s was the removal of top soils by US farmers driven to overproduce in the 1920s by low prices caused by the conditions of over supply created by the  preceding period of high prices before and during the First World War.

Falling prices during the supply glut caused by rising production however eventually undermine the position of marginal producers, especially if as US farmers were in the 1920s and as some US shale producers are today, they are heavily indebted. 

In the 1930s in the US farm industry there was actually a foreclosure crisis.  It is not completely impossible that something similar may eventually happen amongst weaker producers in the US shale industry.

Once the process has finally run its course prices will recover - probably by more than some assume.

The last few months have shown that Russia is capable of weathering the oil price fall.  Indeed a period of lower oil prices is arguably beneficial to an economy with low debt that wants to expand its agricultural and manufacturing base.  Used properly a period of low oil prices should encourage higher investment in agriculture and manufacturing as opposed to energy, which has had a disproportionate share of investment up to now.

For this period of lower oil prices to be used properly, so that long-term investment in manufacturing and industry become truly profitable, inflation and interest rates need to fall below what have been their historic levels in Russia, which is why the government is so single-mindedly focused on lowering inflation.

———————————————

From the Financial Times

The rebalancing of the oil market that started last year has yet to run its course and a bottom in prices “may still be ahead”, according to the world’s leading energy forecaster.

In a bearish assessment of market conditions the International Energy Agency said the adjustment process would “extend well into 2016” as production — led by Opec nations — continued to swell and demand growth softened.

The Paris-based agency, which advises the world’s biggest economies on energy policy, said the oil market was “massively oversupplied”.

Global oil supply surged by 550,000 barrels a day in June to 96.6m b/d, up 3.1m b/d from the same month a year ago, the IEA said in a widely followed monthly report

“The market’s ability to absorb that oversupply is unlikely to last. Onshore storage space is limited. So is the tanker fleet. New refineries do not get built every day,” the IEA said. “Something has to give.”

That something could be US shale oil, the agency said. Relentless supply growth from North America has been one of the factors contributing to the glut in crude oil.

While some weakness in US shale oil output was beginning to show “it may also take another price drop for the full supply response to unfold”, the IEA warned.

Oil prices on both sides of the Atlantic fell sharply this week, with Brent crude — the international benchmark — entering bear market territory. Brent hit $55 a barrel on Monday, rattled by the financial turmoil in Greece and the stock market rout in China. On Friday Brent had risen back to $59 a barrel — a level that is still almost 50 per cent lower than last year’s $115 a barrel June peak.

Cost savings, efficiency gains and hedging have helped shale producers “defy expectations” until now, but supply growth ground to a halt in May and is forecast to stay at these levels through mid-2016, the IEA noted. After growing at 1.7m b/d in 2014, US shale onshore production is forecast to slow to 900,000 b/d this year and 300,000 b/d in 2016.

As a whole, the IEA expects non-Opec supply growth will slow to 1m b/d in 2015 and stay flat in 2016 as lower oil prices and spending cuts take hold.

Although the IEA increased its global demand growth forecast for 2016 to 1.2m b/d — taking total demand to 95.2m b/d — it is still less than 1.4m b/d it predicts for this year.

 

“World oil demand growth appears to have peaked in the first quarter of 2015 at 1.8m barrels a day and will continue to ease throughout the rest of this year and into next,” said the IEA.

A possible Greek exit from the eurozone could suppress demand across the continent if economic activity was to weaken, the IEA said.

The agency said that would not translate into a “tighter market” for oil in 2016 as long as members of Opec, the oil producing cartel, continued to pump at near record levels.

“The group is not slowing down. On the contrary, its core Middle East producers are pumping at record rates and the outlook for Iraqi capacity growth — accounting for most projected Opec expansions — keeps improving,” it said.

Opec crude supply reached a three-year high in June to 31.7m b/d, up 340,000 b/d from the prior month, led by Iraq, Saudi Arabia and the UAE.

The IEA estimates that the demand for the cartel’s crude will stand at 30.3m b/d next year, up 1m b/d from 2015. But this is still a “whopping” 1.4m b/d less than its current production.

An Iranian nuclear deal with world powers could also unleash more barrels on to the market.

 

 

 



via Vincent Varisano, Why the Oil Glut will Continue and How it Benefits Russia

Vincent Varisano Why Russia's Gas Pipeline Deal With Greece Is Likely to Be Stillborn

Vincent Varisano,

After prolonged discussion and some agonising, Greece has now confirmed that it has a preliminary agreement with Gazprom to build a gas pipeline across Greece from the hub in Turkey.

This agreement bears only a pale resemblance to the proposal that was discussed in Moscow and Athens in March and April.  Most importantly it does not come with a pre-payment.

Greece will not therefore see any financial benefit from this pipeline until 2019 and - unlike the proposals discussed in March and April - what has now been signed can in no way be considered part of a larger bailout package of Greece involving Russia and the other BRICS states (see What Russia Offered Greece, Russia Insider, 25th June 2015).

With Greece in default to the IMF, capital controls imposed on the country and Greece’s banks in only partial operation, there is anyway simply no time now for the sort of financial package involving the BRICS Bank the Russians were talking about in March and April.  Not surprisingly therefore, in recent days the Russian Finance Ministry has moved to downplay that option. 

The underlying story of the Greek crisis is that though there were some elements within the Greek government - notably the Energy Ministry - that were keen on a realignment with Russia and the BRICS, the predominant faction in the Greek government, including at all times the Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras and both the outgoing and the incoming Finance Ministers, Varoufakis and Tsakalotos, always thought in the end solely in terms of a deal with the EU. 

It is doubtful in fact that this pipeline will ever be built.  

Despite some claims to the contrary, the political will to build the pipeline to Turkey is certainly there on both sides, and there is no doubt it will be built.

By contrast the will to build the pipeline in Greece does not seem to be there.  At the moment it looks very much like the pet project of the Energy Minister, Panagiotis Lafazanis, rather than something the entire Greek government is signed up to. 

Given the implacable opposition to the project of the US and the EU, that all but guarantees its failure.

 

 

 

 

 



via Vincent Varisano, Why Russia's Gas Pipeline Deal With Greece Is Likely to Be Stillborn